Taking a conservative approach, I'm assuming they stopped relatively shallow because they weren't seeing any more mineralisation. On that basis I'm looking for a relatively shallow, possibly smaller scale but exploitable sulphide resource. I'd take something that was relatively cheap to get up and might fund the company for 5+ years.
But maybe they've got evidence that what they've hit is a direct pointer to a deeper, larger system? In which case maybe the geos thought better to conserve some drilling capital to get underneath with a well prepared campaign?
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.7¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $11.03M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.7¢ | 0.7¢ | 0.7¢ | $54.32K | 7.760M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 635000 | 0.7¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.8¢ | 2006463 | 7 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 15.23pm 17/06/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
| ICG (ASX) Chart |