I was going to wax lyrical on the parameters, then i deleted and posted the shortened version.
Id split the reservoir up into two. The upper 400 m and the lower 400 m.
For the lower 400 m, id use the numbers you have for Sw and RF.
For the upper 400 m id use ave Sw of 0.2 and RF of 0.85, thinking it would be drier and behave more like volumetric reservoir.
Porosity/permeability is anyones guess. Id be happy to assume 0.16 is ave for the field.
The lower 17 m of Kingia, i understand has matrix porosity and fracture porosity. The latter enhances the matrix porosity and consequently the overall effective porosity. Lets say that phenomenon aggregates to an additional 10% of pay (i.e. 10% of 17 m. 1.7 m additional pay).
I was going to do a monte carlo simulation on all this, but in the end i did not complete it because the more you do the more you realise you dont know.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- NWE
- Ann: Increase in Lockyer Deep Potential Resource Area
Ann: Increase in Lockyer Deep Potential Resource Area, page-96
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 101 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add NWE (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
EQN
EQUINOX RESOURCES LIMITED.
Zac Komur, MD & CEO
Zac Komur
MD & CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online