Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

ECT

Click for more information

0.00%

0.3¢ environmental clean technologies limited.

Gday Sam, Good to hear your opinion on where we are at, i just...

First 99 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
mangosmoothie

68 Posts.

23

03/04/18

11:34

Post #: 32181265
Share

Originally posted by samfiodiving ↑

Well its good to see the SP moving in the right direction and at long last something to talk about through our most recent Ann

I like many others here believe the only reason we are getting the visitors over here is for the signing of the MPA

@sholtz I wondered why the question,

Where would we sooner see the signing done , suddenly it all drops into place,

That is some crystal ball you have there my friend LOL

What I do question though with a differing opinion from both Sideways and Sholtz on the paragraph below

which I do not think can be ignored as it is quite a significant statement and I am amazed no one else has put more emphasis on this

The MPA provides the framework for the broad commercial
arrangements needed to execute the R&D project, including
funding, technical development, engineering, construction,
commissioning and operational R&D activities.

Detailed agreements covering these matters will be negotiated after the MPA is signed.

The MPA also clearly articulates the intent for the Intellectual Property generated in this R&D work to be utilised to underpin commercial projects, and sets the value sharing structure between the parties from the resulting projects.

Sideways has taken it at face value and making the most of this highlighted section and there is no denying HE IS CORRECT

READ IT

It clearly defines post MPA signing

And Sholtz you say

Yes SW, thats what the company originally wanted at the time so there would be no hold up with the signing of the MPA. That obviously didn’t happen so from that point of view it’s not unreasonable to assume all those negotiations have now taken place prior to the upcoming signing of the MPA.

Not saying you are incorrect here because your crystal ball never ceases to amaze me

However with the Ann being on the 23 / 3 / 18 it has taken how many years to finalise this deal I do not see them getting all that is covered in that paragraph together from then until the signing

So how do I actually see this I don’t see it as either a positive or a negative

I see it as another ill written announcement like so many we have had in the past in need of clarification

My take on this, is that one has to read between the two announcements dated 8 / 3 / 18 and the 23 / 3 18 to put the whole thing together and understand where this Ann may have fallen short.

AS IN

8 / 3 / 18

Our partners have approached this project with a long-term view.
So, while the project commences with an R&D stage with an
estimated equipment budget of around A$35M, the MPA provides the basis for the subsequent commercial deployment of the technologies, which may entail significant future investment

Also taken from the news letter

The project is divided into two phases:

R&D phase: aims to deliver a pilot scale demonstration with a capacity of two tonnes per hour of steel output (up from test plant scale of ~40kg per hour)

Commercial phase: following successful R&D, scale up to over 60 tonnes per hour (~500,000 tonnes per year) of steel product output, consisting several modular Matmor furnaces.

As you can see from the news letter divided into 2 phases one would think by now they would have
the R& D phase locked down agreed to.

So we move onto

THE PARAGRAPH

The MPA provides the framework for the broad commercial
arrangements needed to execute the R&D project, including
funding, technical development, engineering, construction,
commissioning and operational R&D activities.

Detailed agreements covering these matters will be negotiated after the MPA is signed.

I believe this is where the ANN is ill written IMHO because if we now go back to the Ann on the 8 / 3 18
And follow on

Our partners have approached this project with a long-term view.
So, while the project commences with an R&D stage with an
estimated equipment budget of around A$35M, the MPA provides the basis for the subsequent commercial deployment of the technologies, which may entail significant future investment
the MPA provides the basis for the subsequent commercial
deployment of the technologies, which may entail significant
future investment
For example, the scope within our techno-economic feasibility (TEF) study was for a Matmor plant with a capacity of 500,000 tonnes per annum of finished steel billet, with an estimated
capital investment of around A$300 million.
In that context, the extended period and rigour of review
and engagement between the parties have been entirely appropriate in setting the frame work to
step through the R&D phase and onwards to commercial scale ( NOTE STEP THROUGH )

So reading between the two Ann it now starts to make sense that the

MPA is far bigger than the R & D phase

The Ann cannot say all ends are tied up because the MPA incorporates the broader layout into the up scaling to 500,000 tonnes per annum,

Hence I presume all items in THE PARAGRAPH will still be under negotiations post MPA signing

This is my take on it anyway an ill written Ann that I believe requires clarification which I will be seeking

If I am incorrect then I would say we are being set up for another tripartite agreement where by there will be no information forthcoming on the MPA details because it is still under negotiations and we as shareholders must have been expecting to much once more after all it was written in the ann on the
23/ 3/ 18 all details are ongoing

I hope as a long term shareholder it is the former theory and not the latter and that we do get enough information that the market can at last put a true value on the potential of this SLEEPING GIANT

And all LT holders get their just rewards

Well done to Lloyd and all those that have done the heavy lifting in numbers at market just recently great to see, but we desperately need new blood here lets hope THE MPA BRINGS IT HOME

That’s is MHO anyway make of it what you will

Hope everyone had a great Easter

GO ESI

Expand

Gday Sam,

Good to hear your opinion on where we are at, i just have one question, the company has suggested that they hope to have finacial closure by end of june, what do you believe this will entail? Surely it has to cover everything in reguards to royalties, and the split?

All IMO

ESI Price at posting: 1.6¢ Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Held
1 Upvote

0 Great analysis

Reply

Top Stories

AIZ

Air New Zealand ditches 2030 emissions targets – right as ASIC's Scope 3 reporting changes kick in for FY25

KSN

Mineral Hill transition kicks off for Kingston, gold and silver ramp up to follow

NWH

NRW Holdings voted Wealth Within's hot stock tip

Super PITch gold sponsor RSM Australia: Can Diggers & Dealers 2024 be key to reinvigorating IPO activity?

MTL

Mantle Minerals' Nick Poll talks to HotCopper on finding gold grades up to 3.57g/t at Mt Berghaus

This thread is closed.

You may not reply to this discussion at this time.

There are more pages in this discussion • 198 more messages in this thread...

First 99 Last

Add ECT (ASX) to my watchlist

(20min delay)
Last 0.3¢		Change 0.000(0.00%)		Mkt cap ! $9.515M

Open	High	Low	Value	Volume
0.3¢	0.3¢	0.3¢	$5.745K	1.915M

Buyers (Bids)

No.	Vol.	Price($)
38	24264363	0.2¢

Sellers (Offers)

Price($)	Vol.	No.
0.3¢	3301911	5

View Market Depth

No.	Vol.	Price($)
38	24264363	0.002
18	27219024	0.001
0	0	0.000
0	0	0.000
0	0	0.000

Price($)	Vol.	No.
0.003	3301911	5
0.004	11153031	14
0.005	5729789	31
0.006	5261067	11
0.007	2628334	7

Last trade - 15.59pm 30/07/2024 (20 minute delay)

ECT (ASX) Chart

SPONSORED BY