not sure what numbers you are looking at but when you strip away the noise of the abnormals the profit is not good. How can you believe the claimed underlying npat when it is by shifting costs to being transformation each year that creates most of the profit?
When a company makes it hard to follow their numbers, they are hiding something as they have something to hide.
not sure what numbers you are looking at but when you strip away...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 10 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add IFL (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$2.27 |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.522B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 97 | $2.45 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $2.21 | 481 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 09.45am 30/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| IFL (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable