I did not realise I was being ambiguous Names Little, I thought it was an obvious inference or perhaps even an overt matter of discussion that we were talking about substantial holdings. After all, another 40-something million shares certainly lines up the one or two new institutional holders to hit the 5%+ threshold.
Alas, I will try to be more clear with my words in future so as to avoid causing you further confusion and distress.
I did not realise I was being ambiguous Names Little, I thought...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 14 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
