thank you for the encouragement - if the Austchina sale is completed for $1.2m do you think the ASX will consider Cassius will remain qualified to satisfy Listing rule 12.1? I ask this because the only thing CMD will tout as a mining & resources company is owning the limestone in Madagascar, probably why they need a valuation. You would have thought the lithium tenements in Tanzania were more valuable than Madagascar limestone. With the Ghana case, it will require at least $2m to hear the case in late 2025, add legal costs so far and this is more than total cap value of Cassius. If Cassius loses and has to pay Ghana legal cost, what then?
CMD Price at posting:
0.6¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Not Held
