Taking a quick look at this.
TAW in their PFS study have a plant at 161.2 tph for an EBITA of $A83M per annum.
https://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20170711/pdf/43kkjk14z4kr79.pdf
DHR are proposing a plant at 50 tph, so the simple proportional calculation gives us:
50 / 161.2 x $A 83M = $A25.7M.
So DHR are essentially aiming to achieve a rough ballpark EBITA of $A25.7M.
Of course need to allow for differences in economics of the deposit, but good for a rough indication. TAW have Tantalum credits and stockpiles that improve their economics. I'm thinking $A15M as a conservative figure for average annual EBITA from a DHR starter pit. They could improve on these numbers if they can better TAW's 1.18% Mineral Resource grade.
They are planning to get something in operation within about 16 months. That would be super fast (and perhaps optimistic). Let's see how they go.
Edit - so A$15M+ would be a nice earner to boost funding of a more sophisticated operation targeting value-add LCE outputs.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- NPM
- Ann: Investor Presentation (Canary Networks)
Ann: Investor Presentation (Canary Networks), page-38
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 5 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add NPM (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
1.4¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $4.166M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
1.4¢ | 1.4¢ | 1.4¢ | $1.095K | 78.24K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 266385 | 1.3¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
1.4¢ | 78202 | 2 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 266385 | 0.013 |
4 | 576000 | 0.012 |
2 | 500000 | 0.011 |
2 | 308000 | 0.010 |
2 | 200000 | 0.009 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.014 | 78202 | 2 |
0.015 | 1070000 | 2 |
0.016 | 100500 | 2 |
0.017 | 183716 | 2 |
0.018 | 1446651 | 3 |
Last trade - 10.18am 06/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
NPM (ASX) Chart |