Yes "Sue", it was a bit obvious, but welcome back anyway....

Yes "Sue", it was a bit obvious, but welcome back anyway. Personally I'm not afraid to read what you have to say and decide for myself whether to accept or dismiss each claim. That's exactly what I do with all posts, whether positive or negative about the company. If I think the post contains value I consider it. Similarly, if I think it contains nothing but another load of biased garbage I dump it. When a concerted campaign by a team of NON-HOLDING down-rampers arises (yet again) to dampen interest by potential investors, it's worth asking what their motive is? In the short to medium term it can't do the company's SP any good. However - with all due respect to those who deserve respect for their contributions but at risk of deflating an overblown ego or two - imo what ANY ordinary HC poster has to say makes very little (probably no) difference to the money men who ultimately dictate a company's long-term future.