If directors are not prepared to address the "elephant in the room" about:
1. excessive CEO and COO remuneration;
2. confirming existing CEO and COO loans will be repaid in cash asap; and
3. response to the company's unsatisfactory remuneration strategy (refer to the last two AGMs with over 25% of shareholders voting against the report).
Why vote for the delisting when that requirement for mandated remuneration transparency will disappear?
I've already voted no to the delisting - if for no other reason than directors are not being transparent now.
How will this look as an unlisted public company? Scary stuff.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ann: Investor Presentation for Shareholder Webinar
If directors are not prepared to address the "elephant in the...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 66 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add LVT (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
0.6¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $6.474M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
LVT (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable
The Watchlist
LU7
LITHIUM UNIVERSE LIMITED
Alex Hanly, CEO
Alex Hanly
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online