Well I prefer to take what company says they have, they don't say it's potential, they say they have 15,000 acres to which they added a further 6,000 acres to make a total of 21,000 acres for the Red Valley Project.
See previous post of the company's announcement or refer to their previous announcements.
It's all that the company have stated themselves, you're free to obviously think what you like but it's kinda like saying I see their lithium project as potentially having Cobalt in the ground but the company never said anything about that, but what the hell I like to see things my own way even if they don't exist
I'm not worried why you are here, but your insistence numerous times that the company don't have 21,000 acres of which they stated very clearly they do becomes a bit ridiculous and is false when I've provided the information that company has provided in announcements that clearly says they do have 21,000 acres.
There's no tit for tat, or question if you're wrong, the company's announcements prove you are wrong and I'm simply providing the information that the company has given out which anyone else is able to access and see for themselves to. It's kind of like arguing 2+2 = 5 when it clearly doesn't.
No issues from me, just don't like misleading or false comments when the correct information is easily available and plain to see.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- RMX
- Ann: Investor Presentation - March 2017
Ann: Investor Presentation - March 2017, page-20
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 88 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add RMX (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
0.1¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $3.873M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.1¢ | 0.1¢ | 0.1¢ | $1.14K | 1.140M |
Featured News
RMX (ASX) Chart |