Agreed. I wonder whether David was talking about the "we" as in his management team rather than when retail investors would know what's happening. If the "we" was the TG6 management team then he would be correct. Within a couple of weeks the TG6 management team would know whether the drill rigs had hit intercepts. If they hit pegmatites, they would know the length of the intercept. From the combination of UV light and a hand-held Raman they would have some idea about mineralisation and grade (but not up to ASX release standard).
The 18th satellite pass was unfortunately cloud covered.
Like-for-like Target B and initial BurmeisterTarget B has a drilling pattern that is similar to the first six holes at Burmeister - two strings of three holes that are 200m apart. The first satellite picture is the 8th July satellite pass. The 2nd more red picture is Burmeister (RC6-11). The best Jaegermeister hole in terms of halo's is the far right on the 2nd row (RC08 using the locations of Burmeister) and it compares favourably from satellite visuals with any of the first 6 Burmeister holes.
Burmeister. Using the peroxide assay results, the top row below is: RC09: 3m @ 0.06% highly weathered (the DD extension wasn't at the start done), RC10: 9m @ 1.36% from 113m and RC11: 10m @ 1.80% from 86m. The bottom row was RC06: 9m @ 1.77% from 30m, RC07: 6m @ 0.97% from 26m and RC08 NSI
