And a little frustrating they keep on underselling/not representing the early drill results. The infill drilling does however have the potential to re-report this high-grade, nearer surface areas of the pegmatite through new drill holes. Perhaps its just a waiting game?
Having realised the acid was understating results TG6 changed to Fusion Li2O tests. TGRC0011 was 9m @ 1.62% in early reporting. With the correction to fusion tests other big lithium explorers use, RC11 becomes:
- With a 0.6% cut its 9m @ 1.93%.
- With a 0.5% cut its 10m @ 1.80%.
- With a 0.4% cut its 11m @ 1.68%.
- All three of these are better than the intercepts chosen for highest grade drill hole presented in the slide deck
When a drill result of 9m @ 1.93% or 10m @ 1.80% is available as an intercept to report and 10.5m @ 1.60% from a different drill hole is used instead?? I'm sure there's a strategy, but I'm just not sure what it is.
Original (Acid based)
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- TG6
- Ann: Investor Presentation - RIU Gold Coast Resources Showcase
Ann: Investor Presentation - RIU Gold Coast Resources Showcase, page-3
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 134 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add TG6 (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
18.0¢ |
Change
-0.015(7.69%) |
Mkt cap ! $12.79M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
19.0¢ | 19.0¢ | 18.0¢ | $62.46K | 340.4K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
6 | 133253 | 18.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
19.0¢ | 625 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
5 | 127698 | 0.180 |
2 | 27388 | 0.175 |
4 | 98823 | 0.170 |
2 | 102000 | 0.160 |
1 | 5783 | 0.155 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.190 | 625 | 1 |
0.200 | 371 | 1 |
0.210 | 10106 | 1 |
0.220 | 4105 | 1 |
0.225 | 35027 | 1 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 18/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
TG6 (ASX) Chart |