And a little frustrating they keep on underselling/not...

And a little frustrating they keep on underselling/not representing the early drill results. The infill drilling does however have the potential to re-report this high-grade, nearer surface areas of the pegmatite through new drill holes. Perhaps its just a waiting game?

Having realised the acid was understating results TG6 changed to Fusion Li2O tests. TGRC0011 was 9m @ 1.62% in early reporting. With the correction to fusion tests other big lithium explorers use, RC11 becomes:

• With a 0.6% cut its 9m @ 1.93%.
• With a 0.5% cut its 10m @ 1.80%.
• With a 0.4% cut its 11m @ 1.68%.
• All three of these are better than the intercepts chosen for highest grade drill hole presented in the slide deck

When a drill result of 9m @ 1.93% or 10m @ 1.80% is available as an intercept to report and 10.5m @ 1.60% from a different drill hole is used instead?? I'm sure there's a strategy, but I'm just not sure what it is.


Original (Acid based)