If AMX is able to offer better pricing than NEA why wouldn't you? Same as saying why would you buy bread from Coles if you can do the same from Aldi and Woolworths.
Of a 20M Revenue AMX has 20M cash. NEA doesn't have 100M cash compared to their 100M revenue or ACV as they've stated.
That tells me that AMX is more flexible on it's pricing, on top of that the compensation of their management is far lower than NEA.
It means they will be able to offer lower prices just to get bigger market share. Otherwise I think the industry is big and both companies can benefit, I hold them both.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
20.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $19.47M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 20.5¢ | 20.5¢ | 20.5¢ | $1.507K | 7.352K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 25200 | 20.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 21.5¢ | 12000 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 11.19am 25/06/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
| AMX (ASX) Chart |