I find that more frustrating than anything. Must be two years or more now since they said they would identify the lead candidate and proceed. 5 candidates means 5 times the documentation and research. Omomyc was chosen triallled and point proven at the time. why are we still tooling around with 5 candidates that supposedly do the samed thing. After this long are we not technically capable of defining which is the best?? Sounds like the entree to the next news that we couldnt prepare the data packs on time due to still having too many possible candidates , all awesome candidates of course but still no final result.
I find that more frustrating than anything. Must be two years or...
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$1.30 |
Change
-0.025(1.89%) |
Mkt cap ! $755.3M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $1.32 | $1.32 | $1.30 | $478.1K | 365.3K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | $1.29 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $1.32 | 10000 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 25/07/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
| PYC (ASX) Chart |