Still don't see the point. $20mill at 6% interest (could be higher as it would be reasonably high risk loan) is $1.2mill a year. Why end up with a fully drawn loan that you need to draw down to then take any useful advantage of whilst in the meantime paying interest on it? If this company is going to $1bill as some suggest, or even $200mill, what's a $20mill dilution down the track based on performance? $50mill way to much up-front. Should have been way more incemtive-based (as most acquisitions are).
Would Danny have accepted $20mill less? Who knows. Maybe if it came to the crunch. Maybe instead he could have reduced it by the $16mill loan. Don't know wasn't there but Danny has a pretty decent deal. Worst case scenario he walks away with $70mill ($50mill + $20mill paid in shares over 2 years) plus director and division head salary. Did the tail walk the dog?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- WFL
- Ann: Investor Presentation
Ann: Investor Presentation, page-119
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 31 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add WFL (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
0.3¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.478M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
TG1
TechGen Metals kicks off airborne geophys survey at Sally Downs copper play – a first for the permit
STX
Strike hands $48.5M contract to Clarke Energy to produce 20x 4.5MW gas engines for Sth Erregulla
WFL (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable