Hold on a second, I'm confused...In one post you mention that...

Hold on a second, I'm confused...

In one post you mention that the value is considerably lower than what it is currently trading at and then in another post you mention that it is worth buying at a higher price than that value?? Contradicting statements which leads me to believe a number of things like i said... IYKYK

You mention that you invest yourself and you do it quite successfully, this genuinely makes me happy. I don't do too bad myself but what I trust more than either of our recommendations would be the market itself which is human psychology. People see value and don't miss out on that. Seeing as though some of the securities you hold are down and this is up, I know where I would place my money.

Some of the securities you are advocating only own 25% of projects where Revolver owns 100% of two projects, one very advanced exploration project on a mining lease and trying to grow resource to a more sustainable size +50,000t Cu. Not sure where you are pulling 10,000t Cu, this isn't even in the prospectus.

Go read the prospectus and you will see the exploration potential in the near mine environment both along strike and down dip, it is very very interesting. There is evidence of extension to the existing historical mineralization systems at the Dianne's project along the 2km untested trend.

Also, the palmer river region, is known for Gold...

All of that is just Dianne. Then there is Osprey... That in itself, warrants looking at. A lot of deep drilling and geophysics. Again, all in the prospectus, this was all owned by tier 1 mining companies.

All in all, investors should seek to do their own research and also see things for what they really are. When you have 80% of shares escrowed by shareholders, what does that tell you? Investors put two and two together.

As always, good luck to all.