Looks like it is easy to put those with different points of view...

Looks like it is easy to put those with different points of view in suspension while continuing the lies. A three to four fold increase in the significance of a study due to much larger population being assessed and you still continue with the low N value bull . 11 lots were tested, howmany would you say were needed?

(we can hold in suspension Bazsa's suggestion that there may be more than one patient per data point - so each of the 11 might be an average - (with 2 patients behind one data point perhaps 3 behind another perhaps all adding up to say 40 at the max (but its less than that though because you can't include subjects who got multiple lots - this is still only single lots (that's written on the slide) I can deal with that later multiples per dot suggestion of Bazsa's later I think)."[

Are look at the P values, how could they be so different ?
Glad to see I am not the only one to be put on suspension when the facts get in the way of a good story


chahttps://hotcopper.com.au/posts/74182160/singlenge?

"which is the only potential adequate and well controlled study (the FDA is supposed to have at least one for a BLA"

Well done, that makes 3 piles of bull in one post.

I really do wish you a good trip to the cliff face.