Truss20, I need you to retract this statement please. I'd say or...

Truss20, I need you to retract this statement please. I'd say or explain - but I don't see that an explanation is possible.

I want to have respectful discussions - I think you do too. We (you and I) were talking (more recently) - I think constructively (eventually) about DFU and I can pick that up again (that's where common ground for shareholders might matter) - I haven't forgotten.

That (respectful discussions) isn't really possible on the basis of untrue statements about one's identity - claiming to be someone else. And for your statement to be true you'd have had to have been using multiple nicks at the same time - that (multiple nicks for one person) would be a problem for the forum.

That in itself would make the forum something that could make false markets which would harm the proper working of the actual market. I want the actual market to work.

I am not against loyalty to friends. I would rather make a friend than an enemy myself. I'd rather go to a meeting to shake hands then throats. I want to meet and greet not meet and beat.

It is not like I can't understand loyalty - or that people can make mistakes - including Sector - and they can sometimes change - if they want to.

I cannot make peace with Sector through an intermediary if the intermediaries have values such that they pretend to be Sector. Values matter. They sort of define us. The things we won't do. Or regret doing if we do them because they reduce us.

Certain things are bedrock wrong. Pretending to be someone else to protect someone else (because of an assumption that the someone else will be harmed or face consequences) is wrong.

Maybe I could say this with fewer words - maybe sentence number one was enough.