As an investor, I bought in around 5 years ago on the strength...

As an investor, I bought in around 5 years ago on the strength of their (LBL) apparent game changing technology and the apparent massive savings in future costs to those who adopt the technology v traditional ways. If someone can present me with a solution which will save me material amounts of future costs (say electricity, or petrol, or annual service costs) I am all ears.

If the deal stacks up, I will act. If it sounds too good to be true, like the adverts on YouTube about small AC’s that operate virtually for free, I know it is wank, and won’t react. Also, there are some associations where the credibility and reliability of a service are so strong that lower price or cost savings are immaterial - this is the situation with my professional advisers. Their proven advice over the years PLUS the pain of going through a change are massive reasons for me to stay put.

Ain’t no different to those people who look at the LBL offering. My simple brain says, if LBL is so good and beneficial, why are they not reacting at a much stronger rate than current?
I mean, come on, a tight arse, savvy, cost accountant would sell his soul to go into the CEO’s and say ‘boss, I can save the company x million over the next 10 years’

why aren’t they buying?

Grasshopper, your take on this issue alone would be appreciated as it is now front and centre in my ongoing investment status with LBL. I don’t get such clarity from Wayne, just a medium term prediction, that we don’t achieve.