the reason for the discrepancy is detailed in the report, i interpreted it as though that extra 30mil revenue was cancelled out by payments for goods that generated that revenue, so yes while it is revenue it has a direct resulting cost. so doesnt really contribute anything. interested if others thought the same
Ann: Investor update, page-17
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 39 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)