Multiple thumbs up from me, 1, many thanks. I was actually more...

Multiple thumbs up from me, 1, many thanks. I was actually more curious about their AI tech grunt than their geo grunt as I had seen they had some geo grunt in the top team. I would guess there is AI and then there is quality AI and AI can only be as good as the people that create and maintain it. Terms used in clinical studies may well apply here: it will be the sensitivity and specificity of the results that will make or break S3N's AI. In other words does the AI give sufficiently low rates of false negatives and false positives.

I agree that the making of this company will be if it does improve the exploration success rate by five or ten fold (depending on how they define "success"). At the current market price there is not too much downside risk but it does seem to have lots of upside "risk". As I said, interesting story.