Before anyone goes down that track, they need to think just what...

Before anyone goes down that track, they need to think just what this will achieve. I'm sure there are others with experience in running this style of company, but they won't be cheap, nor will they have the knowledge of the company and the product.

What is needed, if anything is needed, is to take a measured approach to change rather than the 3 strike process or this 249D rule which in my opinion would be even more damaging.

Holders also need to consider and take reassurance from the faith in the company shown by a number of organisations, DW financier, Capricorn, Carpet Court and others, who no doubt have full knowledge of the company's future before getting involved.

I don't disagree things need to change with respect to communications with the shareholders, but this is not the way.