If your post refers specifically to my earlier post, I started...

If your post refers specifically to my earlier post, I started off by saying I was not downramping. Just looking at the data sets we have from the announcement and making as best and factually as possible some comments on the data we have (ie, the announcement narrative and the core visuals). Nothing more, nothing less. Its important with these kinds of "discovery holes" to keep things in some form of perspective. I've been an investor in mining stocks for over 35 years, both investing long term as well as day trading, and by the way worked in the minerals resources sector for over 25 years ( now retired). I call it as I see it, no hype and no deliberate downramping. For all I know this could prove to be the discovery of the century, or not. But there are a lot of newbies out there who at first glance take notice of 50 metre mineralized intersection, see some beautiful core pictures, plus a mention of chalcopyrite and bornite, then put 1 and 1 together and come up with 3.