IP has been a proven method for many years. Seems like a waste of money to prove a method that has already been proven? SX2 have just spent a million dollars on an IP survey over most of their lease. The IP survey at NAG gave false targets because they were identifying marine sediments which are high in sulphur. NAG didn't have a geologist so they didn't understand what they were looking at. If you have good geologists then IP surveys are one of the best methods to find sulphur rich zones of minerals.
IP has been a proven method for many years. Seems like a waste...
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
59.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $245.3M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 59.5¢ | 60.0¢ | 58.5¢ | $1.587M | 2.684M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 295454 | 59.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 60.0¢ | 149805 | 5 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 20/06/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
| LRV (ASX) Chart |