Originally posted by disenfranchised
It's interesting how before AVQ fell off a cliff straight into the crapper the 'holders' or rose coloured glasses brigade would ridicule all those with a negative view accusing us (yes I am one of the nay sayers) of not having a clue what we were talking about.They would literally gang up on any negative poster or non holder and literally tell them they have no right to make their comments heard on this forum. Now, after the catastrophic events in December and the following announcements the same yay brigade are still telling us we have no idea what we are talking about. It's unfathomable that these people are still marching to and saluting AVQ's business acumen and labelling the CEO or first at the trough, as I like to refer to that person as, as a dead set genius.
Without Kolosori this company is dead in the water. End of story.
For gods sake stop defending the indefensible and take a look at the share price, take a look at the books, take a look at the graft and corruption in the SI, take a look at all the other companies that have tried and failed over the years.
Interesting, since AVQ were knocked back I have not seen one comment from the company as to how they intend to cut costs and curb the cash haemorrhage that is still occurring at an alarming rate. A pay cut for first at the trough would be a great start.
And for those that bother to do research (holders or non-holders), there is a possibility that Tenement D is also now questionable, I am still waiting for the lawyers to get confirmation from their client/tribe that they represent with my inquiry, maybe if more of us ask the question, they are incline to be more fore-coming.....
