re: Ann: Issue of Performance Rights and Rete... As I understand it terms of T/O explicitly forbid issuing any further rights without Blossomvale’s consent, so if T/O offer was to be kept alive such consent would be necessary.
It beats me however why would Blossomvale volunteer the additional expense of some $1M?
Note that if this extra $1M was used towards the upgrade of their current lousy T/O price this T/O price would then be close to $0.033. Yet Blossomvale has apparently decided to spend this money on the management, not on shareholders. Why?
Is it therefore not a Blossomvale-funded "bonus-in-disguise” for the management to look after their interests? And if so: wouldn't the management be in breach of their statutory obligations towards the shareholders?
re: Ann: Issue of Performance Rights and Rete... As I understand...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 3 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)