Dear @aniesbaswedan,@A4paper, @n00bmasta, and any other poster who are one sided bias against ISX
I feel for once to show that you do not have an agenda in your postings, i ask that you reply to this question below. I would appreciate that you answer it honestly without adding in any additional information not asked for, like ; but, however. Just for once (as you've not been doing this for 10 months now) just for once, answer the question, as hypothetical as it is, give your opinion on this situation/question. Please?
Question - What if the holders here are correct and JK and ISX come out of all this, through the courts with a clean (enough) bill of health? ASX are forced by the court to lift the suspension and offer an apology to the SH and management of ISX. They are told to pay all court costs and are to pay 50% of the damages say $250 Million by then. Do you believe that if this was the case (forgetting what you thought previously as the court has said you are wrong remember) ISX would be appreciated by the market?
Again, If they win the court case and are able to relist then you are wrong so you can't use previous information you think was correct because the court decides, not you.
What i am asking is to for you to show the ISX holdersand everyone on these threads that you can have a fair and mature conversation and for once leave any bias baggage behind, be the bigger person in this argument.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ann: ISX damages claim increases by $200.7m to over $464.7m
Dear @aniesbaswedan,@A4paper, @n00bmasta, and any other poster...
Featured News
Add SP1 (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
ACW
ACTINOGEN MEDICAL LIMITED
Will Souter, CFO
Will Souter
CFO
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online