Based on the information we currently have available, I'm not sure Jag needs a "premium price" to stack up financially. I recall the scoping study looked pretty good with nickel prices not far off where we are today, even at the lows from a few weeks/months ago.
My view is that being able to tie into a HV power supply for the plant and most mine infrastructure (trucks and other mobile earth moving equipment excepted) is a very real cost advantage.
This alone is worth the approach being taken IMHO.
That this electricity is generated from hydro is just a bonus and if CTM gets some brownie points for having low GHG, great.
The Opex reduction from not having to run a line up of diesel powered generators alone is likely to be compelling.
my 2 cents, ymmv dyor
Ann: Jaguar's Class Leading GHG Footprint Credentials Reconfirmed, page-3
Add CTM (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
39.0¢ |
Change
-0.020(4.88%) |
Mkt cap ! $193.0M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 39.5¢ | 40.5¢ | 39.0¢ | $169.9K | 431.6K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 77861 | 39.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 39.5¢ | 40884 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 10/05/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
|
|||||
|
Last
39.0¢ |
Change
-0.020 ( 3.68 %) |
||||
| Open | High | Low | Volume | ||
| 39.5¢ | 40.0¢ | 39.0¢ | 48428 | ||
| Last updated 15.54pm 10/05/2024 ? | |||||
| CTM (ASX) Chart |