Based on the information we currently have available, I'm not sure Jag needs a "premium price" to stack up financially. I recall the scoping study looked pretty good with nickel prices not far off where we are today, even at the lows from a few weeks/months ago.
My view is that being able to tie into a HV power supply for the plant and most mine infrastructure (trucks and other mobile earth moving equipment excepted) is a very real cost advantage.
This alone is worth the approach being taken IMHO.
That this electricity is generated from hydro is just a bonus and if CTM gets some brownie points for having low GHG, great.
The Opex reduction from not having to run a line up of diesel powered generators alone is likely to be compelling.
my 2 cents, ymmv dyor
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ann: Jaguar's Class Leading GHG Footprint Credentials Reconfirmed
Based on the information we currently have available, I'm...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 6 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add CTM (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
40.0¢ |
Change
-0.010(2.44%) |
Mkt cap ! $202.9M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
39.5¢ | 40.5¢ | 39.5¢ | $76.63K | 193.9K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 99633 | 39.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
40.0¢ | 17075 | 6 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 99633 | 0.395 |
2 | 12700 | 0.390 |
5 | 143231 | 0.385 |
8 | 242752 | 0.380 |
1 | 5700 | 0.375 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.400 | 17261 | 8 |
0.405 | 48102 | 9 |
0.410 | 365093 | 6 |
0.415 | 4774 | 2 |
0.420 | 30000 | 1 |
Last trade - 10.40am 10/05/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
|
|||||
Last
39.5¢ |
  |
Change
-0.010 ( 2.45 %) |
|||
Open | High | Low | Volume | ||
39.5¢ | 39.5¢ | 39.5¢ | 2500 | ||
Last updated 10.44am 10/05/2024 ? |
Featured News
CTM (ASX) Chart |