Based on the information we currently have available, I'm not sure Jag needs a "premium price" to stack up financially. I recall the scoping study looked pretty good with nickel prices not far off where we are today, even at the lows from a few weeks/months ago.
My view is that being able to tie into a HV power supply for the plant and most mine infrastructure (trucks and other mobile earth moving equipment excepted) is a very real cost advantage.
This alone is worth the approach being taken IMHO.
That this electricity is generated from hydro is just a bonus and if CTM gets some brownie points for having low GHG, great.
The Opex reduction from not having to run a line up of diesel powered generators alone is likely to be compelling.
my 2 cents, ymmv dyor
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ann: Jaguar's Class Leading GHG Footprint Credentials Reconfirmed
Based on the information we currently have available, I'm...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 6 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add CTM (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
45.5¢ |
Change
0.030(7.06%) |
Mkt cap ! $223.2M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
43.0¢ | 46.5¢ | 43.0¢ | $189.6K | 426.5K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
3 | 5143 | 45.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
45.5¢ | 5779 | 3 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
5 | 14008 | 0.450 |
6 | 34200 | 0.445 |
6 | 119549 | 0.440 |
3 | 11078 | 0.435 |
5 | 32420 | 0.430 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.455 | 6177 | 3 |
0.460 | 30383 | 5 |
0.465 | 14980 | 3 |
0.470 | 9483 | 3 |
0.475 | 7947 | 2 |
Last trade - 13.21pm 07/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
|
|||||
Last
45.0¢ |
  |
Change
0.030 ( 5.88 %) |
|||
Open | High | Low | Volume | ||
44.0¢ | 46.0¢ | 44.0¢ | 106924 | ||
Last updated 12.34pm 07/06/2024 ? |
Featured News
CTM (ASX) Chart |