I just cannot see the justification of keeping the Idaho...

I just cannot see the justification of keeping the Idaho operation on care and maintenance when the numbers don't stack up.
it costs $12 million to keep the mine on care and maintenance
The bfs by product income has grown by around $15 million since it was done... Copper and gold.
So the company would be saving $27 million US if it wasn't on care and maintenance.
The cobalt price was done @ $7.45/lb operating costs back then and since then the by products increase is $3.56/lb.
So if it was $7.45 minus $3.56 which turns out to be $3.89 cost price. Obviously inflation would have effected that amount which has to come into play.
Cobalt price today is $12.95/lb. Even if you double the cost price for inflation $3.89 x 2 = $7.78
$12.95 - $7.78 =$5.17/lb
$5.17 x (1915 metric tonnes= 4213000lbs) x $5.17 = $21 781210.
So it's $21.7 million US before tax.
The dumb decision to not start up the mine is going to cost the company money it potentially has to help pay our interest bills. Even if we don't have Brazil going we can still ship our Cobalt to Finland or Canada to refine.
My conclusion is it is better to make some money from an asset you have and to stop making excuses that you are preserving the asset by saying that the price of Cobalt will go up in the future. It's irrelevant as the mine is scheduled for 7 years and if the Cobalt price increases over time then the mine will benefit with the higher prices.
The management MUST disclose to shareholders if it's almost completed a better deal in the very near future or it should step aside as it's incompetent.