I guess if you want to look at D&A as a cash loss then yes AGO lost somewhere between $14 and $19 / tonne. D&A is not a cash cost but a taxation mechanism.
One assumes that E&E are expensed and not capitalised, although it would only be about $1/t so not material anyway.
I prefer to look at the true cash costs of an operation to determine it's health. First and for-most cash in must be able to cover cash out. Any surplus to repay capitalised costs comes next.
For me, the quarterly is definitely not pretty and shows a business that at the margins is risky. A 5% downward shift in pricing puts AGO in a position that cash in does not cover cash out.
Simply put, AGO is not a healthy business and therefore a high risk investment.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ann: June 2014 Quarterly Report
I guess if you want to look at D&A as a cash loss then yes AGO...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 18 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add AGO (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
LU7
LITHIUM UNIVERSE LIMITED
Alex Hanly, CEO
Alex Hanly
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online