I thought it was a goodish report.
Pfiefers thinking/analysis on the structural aspects being likely related to the old WARF agreements and sub-licensing seems to have been confirmed. Was good to get some clarity on that.
The sentence toward the end on intellectual property seems to be missing a bit - maybe a full stop instead of the word "on"? Not that it matters much but I wonder how it would have been meant to be read.
I should know this - but all CYP patents and IP are essentially WARF patents and IP that CYP helps pay for or does pay for - they don't have independent IP in any areas do they. Sometimes the shorthand references suggest they do - but I don't think they do.
Everything is a license referencing back to WARF held patents?
I think it would be good to have an updated list of patents, licenses etc as I don't think there has been a list as such since the ECO prospectus - could be wrong though.
I thought it was a goodish report.Pfiefers thinking/analysis on...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 21 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add CYP (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
29.5¢ |
Change
0.005(1.72%) |
Mkt cap ! $52.99M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 28.0¢ | 29.5¢ | 27.5¢ | $29.94K | 106.4K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1000 | 27.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 29.5¢ | 10159 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 28/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| CYP (ASX) Chart |