Took an hour or so to process and down load this image.Better...

Took an hour or so to process and down load this image.



Better than sentinel but not really worth the cost for only limited increase in usefulness. Wouldn't mind if it was free or minimal cost.
Image had to be reduced in pixels to get into this post so not the best quality shown here.

The blue colour also not very helpful.

Focusing in on Luni with qgis overlay for various drill hole/site vintages.

Green squares 2023 site prep not drilled. Black circles 2024 sentinel intrep sites/drilling, light blue black magenta squares july 24 drilling/sites from recent posts. White 2023 selected drilling.

Zooming in on the X east area.


Confirms most of sentinel interp (past and recent). Yellow stars may be additional sites but do need to cross reference with other data. Some could be recent preparation not visible with the cloud cover. Or simply ones I have missed before.

Cost goes up dramatically for 1m or finer resolution. Roughly 3 times per sq km but the real kicker is 25 sq Km minimum area vs 5 for the 3m resolution. Will keep looking around and appreciate a heads up if anyone comes up with a useful site.

Sentinel for comparison



===========================

The image at the bottom of the last post was drilling with simplified seismic depth contours at approx. 50 and 70m. Outside the 70m contour gets deeper. The drill pattern does reflect these greater depths except in the south where high grade has led to deeper drilling IMO.