Ann: Jupiter Board and Strategy Update, page-20

Read Pryanks statement before the voting, maybe shady wasn't the right word but definely indications that the interests of the new board are not aligned with retail. Also Mendes statement before the voting were he accused Pryank for bad SP price performance since IPO, when it was apparant that the SP was low because of high payout ratio(which was clearly articulated in company mandate), low Manganese prices compared to during IPO and also because of the Board drama. Mende must know these reasons so wording things like that is dishonest and also the whole thing of coming in and then iniating the kickout of the founding members shows how he thinks and his character. So if he or other board members have different interests than us they will have zero problem screwing us as well. Also after few weeks stepping down as director again also seems weird to me. Lots of intransparancy and dishonesty, which I dont like.