View attachment 168458
Upon further review you are correct they were looking for more intersections of that 1000 g/t intercept, in that case success I guess, I disagree with that exploration method, I don't personally consider an isolated 1m of anything even 1000 g/t @ 100m down is ever going to be feasible to mine, I just assumed they were going for what maybe below that indicator, my bad.
View attachment 168459
As for comments on AKDD 183 as you can see here they were correct and I also think AKD188 is a waste of a hole, unless they see more out of the first hole, chasing 1m gold veins 100m down waste of time.
Hopefully ARD is type of place where discussion is welcome, it is an exploration campaign that is only 2 holes in with no assays, giving opinions is what this place is for no need to be so aggressive or take any offence we are all allowed to express opinions.
Discussion is ok different opinions are also ok maybe sometimes I am wrong in my assumptions you can express that in a non aggressive matter and leave out the insults, it would be better for everyone thanks.
(20min delay)