Totally agree Danny. As you say, whilst 2m thickness seems like...

Totally agree Danny. As you say, whilst 2m thickness seems like a low number, it's very much offset by the massive footprint... and given that 3 of 11 holes had 4m thickness and the spacing is quite large, one might assume that infill drilling will reveal some areas of greater varying depths/thicknesses. Of course thicker would be better BUT when it's from surface it's happy days IMO.

This stuff can be mined with earthmoving equipment on top of the ground.... sensational!! As I said in another thread... a bit like the skin on a MASSIVE rice pudding.

PLUS OTHER SUPERB ASSETS
PLUS TOP SHELF MANAGEMENT

This thing is dirt cheap from my perspective.

Good luck to us all.