I listened to a world renowned critic of drugs, trials and drug...

I listened to a world renowned critic of drugs, trials and drug companies. I think he is from Sweden or one of those countries. He did a session on drug trials and explained all the ways to satisfy the CDC that your drug should be approved. One thing was, the drug doesnt have to fix anything. As long as they show something improved they can get it approved - especially if they are in cahoots - which they are. Im sure he pointed out how remdesivir was approved. It did something on the plus but had 25 negatives and kills people - but it got approved.
He gave many other examples.
If RCE are trying to get approved for particular use by CDC I would have thought a pathway would be designed with CDC or approved by CDC, and then they would conduct the trials. If the trials worked and got the desired results the drug would be approved to fix whatever the problem was. Urinary tract infections are obvious, real etc and to fix them within almost minutes of taking this concoction should be an instant approval. It should be very easy to prove. Why dont they just move to get that use approved. Obviously great, if it is successful.