That's right it is solely the processing cost and given that it...

That's right it is solely the processing cost and given that it sticks out that they have excluded the other important costs like mining & G/A.

In fact they have the cheek to include some rule of thumb mining cost on page 20 then specify these cost were not used in this coping study only to demonstrate blah blah.

Given there's a ridiculous number of 4.2 g/ t ($176) from processing including G/A (general & amortization) versus their $5/t for, as you noted,processing only in the report one would'nt even try to use that.
Mr bornite interpreted the 4.2 g/t as a typo for 4.2$/t (which they should have fixed by now). Then how doesthe guesstimate 4.2 $/t for processing (including g & a) fit with their more accurate estimate of of 5.03 $/t for processing only.