How is it rubbish, thus far, upon a civilized response to your...

How is it rubbish, thus far, upon a civilized response to your reply instead of discussing the matter you asked the question about my holdings, how is that relevant?

I may be speculating, but in response to a reply you weren't expecting with reason behind the assertion you are now playing the man rather than the ball.

Lucapa is not a profitable company, that's fine - it's not necessarily a bad thing!

But to purport your company to be something that it is not, profitable, you come across as a salesman rather than a knowledgeable shareholder.

Most companies on the ASX are not profitable, Lucapa is one of them, this may change - but at this point the vast majority of capital required is secured via way of cap raise, or option conversion (a veiled form of a cap raise).

In the absence of sustained revenue generation (one-off payments) Lucapa will require further capital to continue its chase toward a hard rock diamond mine, it is what it is & that's fine. I see little benefit dressing something up that it is not.

Exciting diamond explorer with a view to becoming a potential hard rock diamond miner - yes.

Alluvial diamond miner - yes - Receiving consistent revenue for it's efforts (australian entity, the listed company) no.

Does this leave an on-going capital requirement to achieve goal number one - absolutely yes