Ann: KLEOS Geospatial Intelligence Released to Customers, page-5

To Carnival referring to your sat tracking posts.
Do you think this business of pulling 3 sats together, then losing one of the 3, was them testing data quality of 2 vs 3 sats?

Also if they can process data from a 3rd party, and from 2 sats, it might make for greater collaboration with the likes of HE360. Theoretically, if HE360 lose a sat, their cluster is stuffed. And they are both in this together to a degree.
Perhaps HE360 might tell them who makes their sats as the Europeans seem to be quite hit and miss.
I have wondered for a while if Kleos might actually be moving from being a data collector to a data processor. Something Andy & Co have muted in talks as being thier emphasis. But perhaps they are looking to give up "managing" the sats altogether, given the dog's breakfast that aspect of operations has been so far.
As fast as they seem to be losing data points - 4 sats to 3 sats to 2 sats - they seem to be compensating by improving processing of the data available.
Just a thought.