I'm trying to make sense of this with what we have in the ann....

I'm trying to make sense of this with what we have in the ann. Seems like management think they could be onto something.

Questions the next few drill holes may help uncover.
Assuming hole 1 and hole 2 share the same mineralised zone and it is continuous,
-Does mineralisation continue to widen southeast?
-Does it continue to surface and if so, do grades maintain?
-Does mineralisation continue toward the 'Undrilled, nickel sulphide mineralised at surface' box on figure 5?
-The further up the hill we go, are there more zones/lenses?

Hole 1 and 2 intercepted at a similar height (from sea level), perhaps this was by design. But the further southeast along this, the further vertically up the hill the land goes as it gets away from the fjord. Maybe the mineralised zone continues to thicken into the hill?

Interesting that the geophysics etc seem to be playing nice and matching results, perhaps the validation of the data and a little further analysis/tweaking will help them dial in where they should be drilling for the next few holes?