My understanding is that the exploitation license is simply an extension of the exploration license provided EIA, SIA etc. are approved. That would mean that Act20 does not apply to ETM's Exploitation license application. Is this not the question arbitration is addressing in the dispute?
Ann: Kvanefjeld Project Update, page-91
Add ETM (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
2.1¢ |
Change
-0.001(4.55%) |
Mkt cap ! $29.58M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 2.2¢ | 2.2¢ | 2.1¢ | $10.53K | 492.0K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 234835 | 2.1¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 2.2¢ | 829344 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 15.03pm 09/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| ETM (ASX) Chart |