No production acquisition will make sense at the current production rate and current price (the vendor can do arithmetic and would not sell).
The key to a successful purchase is:
1. an upswing in POO
2. successful low cost recompletion/stimulation (in this case acid not fraccing) in existing wells especially if cash flow was needed for #3
3. and most importantly, low risk development opportunities.
Reading between the lines, 1/2 the gross acres in the deal are in the Sansinena Field which is a late fold caused by a NW-SE thrust which forms four fields in the Puenta-Chino corridor. Reservoirs are Miocene clastics.
While I have not mapped the fields in detail, I note from the map below the 5 sections of the Sansinena Field (centre of pic) has about 35 wells and some large undrilled areas (each green square is a sq mile) while the fields to the NW and SE have been at least a 20 acre spacing.
The value in the purchase is the amount of undeveloped oil. Have the previous explorers missed something (first oil in the area was 1880)? Only a very detailed study would know but I would add that for a variety of historical and cultural reasons, California has not been explored as thoroughly as other US states.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ann: LA Basin Oil Field Acquisition
No production acquisition will make sense at the current...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 25 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add XST (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
0.9¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $2.893M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
XST (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable