Yeah, not sure why people buy (or discuss) things that they don't know anything about, but I guess it's a forum and some don't have better things to do with their time/life!
In saying, the negatrons, the one-liner drive-byers, without any substance or credibility in their posts/track record, are what really gets me into more research and more posting/sharing of that research and in turn more knowledge/experience, so I thank them for that, even though sometimes I might tell them to go away, I can't live without them! haha
Anyway, from today's announcement:
Hole 20LIRC010 looking like the early part of the Ridgeway deposit discovery at the Cadia Valley.
Ridgeway:
- first hole returned 8m @ 0.42 g/t Au, 0.51% Cu
- subsequent/"discovery" holes returned:
-- 145m @ 4.30 g/t Au, 1.20% Cu and
-- 84m @ 7.40 /gt Au, 1.27% Cu
- by far the highest-grade of the Cadia deposits
- 4.3Moz @ 2.5 /gt Au resource (pre-start of mining and further additions)
Compare Ridgeway's first hole result of 8m @ 0.42 g/t Au, 0.51% Cu to the comparable hole 10 from Lady Ilse of 13m @ 0.72 g/t Au, 0.36% Cu, both from the same depth.
Hole 10 results are significant.
DD currently in progress at hole 10.
Another DD hole completed already.
DD results from mid-October.
It's all in writing, in today's announcement.
Also, see my post from earlier today - hole 10 (and holes 5 & 6) results from Lady Ilse are comparable/better than most of the Boda post-discovery diamond-holes, up to the same depth (maybe re-read that if you're having doubts - MAG RC hole results are better than most of the Boda post-discovery diamond-holes, up to the same depth + also comparable to the first Ridgeway hole).
If you don't understand what the story is here; try and school up on porph basics, check out the comparable/neighbouring deposits/mines and compare them, read the above, read the announcements, it's all there in writing.
Cheers,
GB.
View attachment 2468306
