It will be good to know how that worked, although until drilling...

It will be good to know how that worked, although until drilling based on ANT is undertaken it is all speculation.

The very best case
The best case is that the ANT worked well and there are velocity anomalies that align with the pegmatites intersected in existing drilling (and limited or no anomalies in areas that were drilled and shown not to contain pegmatites). The very best case would also have ANT identifying a big anomaly that could be drill tested using the existing Burmeister PoW approved locations meaning TG6 could soon be in possession of a robust long intercept.

As the very best cases rarely happen, the realistic question is how far from this the results depart form this. If the ANT results are at least moderately successful, does the accuracy get better as additional drilling based constraints are added to the modelling?