Some geopoetry.[Note the red dot in Western Green is misleading....

Some geopoetry.
[Note the red dot in Western Green is misleading. Gram meters can be high for grade or length or both. In this case the c100m intersection at low grade gives rise to a FALSE positive as do the amber dots.]

Could Luni be the source with carbonatite and fluids extending East and West? Might explain the gravity differences with the initial inversion model showing a plumbing structure.




"Junction" of Luni and Green. What happens?


ENR's modeled carbonatite 'envelope' (in white) slams into the area of the Whale's head area.

Conflict between interp/logging for ENR and WA1 with both in "primitive" stages.


Currently WA1 model this as marginal to carbonatite but ENR holes 82 and 83 are logged as being dominantly carbonatite albeit with only low grade niobium.

Past and recent (assays and/or drilling pending) WA1 hole patterns give some support to the trend going NE to Green though there may be an E or SE vector as well.

WA1 reported assays are mixed in this east/NE part of Luni. The variation in holes 105-108 (see image) and also in holes 101-104 (mainly lower grade) may reflect the patchy grades seen in Green priority samples.

Luni Emily

Less information with 200m spaced drilling only available for Luni and preliminary data for Emily suggesting strong similarities to Luni.
As with Green there may be a transition zone suggested by ENR's 2023 drilling. A possible connection south of this drilling could occur on WA1 ground with only hole 48 providing any constraint.

==========
Separate blobs or interconnected bodies. Further drilling will tell.


Just wondering what might be here and P2 EIF in terms of a mineral system. Likely to be connected in some way that is not apparent at the moment ....if ever.