Hi PieI don't want to put words in other people's mouths, nor do...

Hi Pie

I don't want to put words in other people's mouths, nor do i want to argue with strangers on line, but i would assume i was one of the 'parties' Virtuozi speaks of.

If you will allow me to make my point again, hopefully tactfully, the LCK EIR suggested expected flow rates of syngas were 10,000 sm3/h-18,000 sm3/hr (https://sarigbasis.pir.sa.gov.au/WebtopEw/ws/samref/sarig1/image/DDD/PGER00091EIR%20ISG%20PILOT.pdf).

If that's not LCK's definition of commercial flow rates, or something close to it, im unsure why it bears mentioning in the document at all (perhaps it was a guess?).

After the trial concluded, the SA DEM told me repeatedly told me that they had seen all the data from the LCEP / PCD, and that all they saw was a few minutes of flow data in the 1000 sm3/h range, the rest being in the 100s of sm3/hr range.

At the time i asked the company to clarify this, and they bluntly refused - at which point i sold.

I have no issue that the may be able to gasify the >1000 PJs MHA suggest is possible, but i cant see how it can be viable in terms of number of well pairs when one well pair fell significantly short.

Would be great to see this project go ahead, it would be great for the state, there is a fundamental unknown for me.

Cheers