Ann: LCK Signs Heads of Agreement to Commence ISG in China, page-226

Thanks Pie ,

Nice to see i’m not set upon for dissenting !

I’ll try to be balanced in my response

I agree that all coal deposits would react differently, however the trial (including extensions / suspensions) lasted for 6 months, and the flow rates LCK hoped to achieve weren’t sustained for significant periods by their own definitions.

Also - for mine , I don’t consider the ACCC inquiry as
recognition of PCD success, rather a case of claims of one of the largest 2P resources on the ASX and the ACCC basically saying - prove it.

Further - any comments by the company suggesting they have come to an agreement on commercialisation pathway is misleading - the DEM haven’t given LCK special treatment - the approvals pathway will be the same as any other project.

While I’d like to see this thing a success , I’d also be keen to know if anyone else has contacted the DEM at any point post PCD - and to know if they have a different take on it based upon those discussions.

Any figures I guesstimated for gas in ground were also based upon ‘commercial’ flow rates

Perhaps in my discussion I didn’t ask the right questions